My Forex Funds (MFF) and FTMO are two of the most prominent proprietary (prop) trading firms that offer traders the opportunity to manage significant capital after passing an evaluation. This guide explores their definitions, operational mechanics, comparative features, ideal user profiles, evaluation criteria, common myths, and essential risk controls. All content is educational and does not constitute financial advice.
Proprietary trading firms (prop firms) provide capital to skilled traders. Instead of trading with the trader’s own money, the firm funds the account, and the trader receives a percentage of the profits generated. My Forex Funds (MFF) and FTMO are two well-known firms that have popularized the “evaluation challenge” model.
My Forex Funds offers a variety of funding programs (e.g., Rapid, Standard, and Premium) designed to cater to different trading styles and risk appetites. It is known for its flexible dashboard and a broad selection of account sizes, ranging from $5,000 to $2,000,000.
FTMO, based in the Czech Republic, is renowned for its rigorous risk-management framework and sophisticated performance tracking tools. FTMO provides two main challenge types—Standard and Aggressive—and is often praised for its transparent payout structure and trader support ecosystem.
Both firms follow a two-stage evaluation process to filter disciplined traders, though the specifics differ. The general workflow is:
MFF offers multiple paths: the Rapid Challenge targets quick completion (6 days minimum, 30 days max) with a 9% profit target. The Standard Challenge has a 15% profit target over 30 days, offering more flexibility. MFF uses a combination of absolute drawdown (based on the starting balance) and daily loss limits (5%). The firm partners with brokers like Eightcap to provide MT4/MT5 platforms.
FTMO offers a Standard plan (10% profit target in 30 days) and an Aggressive plan (15% profit target in 30 days). FTMO’s risk rules are considered strict: a maximum daily loss of 5% and a maximum total loss of 10% (relative to the starting equity). FTMO provides a proprietary dashboard with detailed statistics, and they also use partner brokers to execute trades. An interesting feature is that FTMO refunds the challenge fee upon successful completion of the first 30-day trading period.
While both firms share the same underlying business model, their rules, costs, and target audiences vary significantly. The table below offers a clear, side-by-side comparison.
| Feature | My Forex Funds (MFF) | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Challenge Types | Rapid, Standard, Premium | Standard, Aggressive |
| Profit Target (Phase 1) | 9% (Rapid) / 15% (Standard) | 10% (Standard) / 15% (Aggressive) |
| Profit Target (Phase 2) | 5% (Rapid) / 10% (Standard) | 5% (Standard) / 7.5% (Aggressive) |
| Max Daily Drawdown | 5% (varies by type) | 5% (both plans) |
| Max Total Drawdown | 10% – 12% (absolute based on start) | 10% (relative to starting equity) |
| Profit Split | 80% (scalable to 90%) | 80% (scalable to 90%) |
| Fee Refund | Refunded on first payout (conditions apply) | Refunded upon passing Phase 1 (first 30 days) |
| Minimum Trading Days | 6 days (Rapid) / 15 days (Standard) | 7 days (both plans) |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5, cTrader |
Note: Rules, fees, and profit splits are subject to change. Always verify the current program details directly on the official MFF and FTMO websites.
Choosing between MFF and FTMO often depends on your trading style, experience, and psychological preferences. Here are a few scenarios that illustrate the best fit.
My Forex Funds with its Rapid challenge can be appealing for traders who want to complete the evaluation quickly and have higher risk tolerance. However, the absolute drawdown rule can be perilous for aggressive scalpers. FTMO’s relative drawdown may offer slightly more breathing room for intraday volatility, but both firms require strict daily loss limits.
Both firms are suitable, but FTMO’s 10% total relative drawdown (tracked from the starting balance) provides a clear hard stop. MFF’s Standard challenge (15% target, 30 days) allows for a longer time horizon, which is beneficial for swing traders who need to weather minor retracements.
If you are concerned about upfront fees, FTMO’s refund policy (returning the fee after passing Phase 1) can be attractive. MFF also refunds the fee upon first payout, but the terms differ. A cost-benefit analysis comparing the fee-to-account-size ratio is essential.
Alex is a swing trader with a $100,000 account. He typically risks 1% per trade and holds
positions for 2–5 days. He is evaluating both firms:
With MFF (Standard): The absolute drawdown is fixed at 10% ($10,000) from the
starting balance. If he dips below this, the challenge fails. This works well for Alex because he
doesn’t plan to risk more than $2,000 per trade.
With FTMO (Standard): The relative drawdown is also 10%, but the daily loss limit
is 5% ($5,000). Alex finds the daily limit more restrictive for his style. He opts for MFF’s
Standard challenge for the reduced daily pressure.
Note: This is a hypothetical illustration. Traders should assess their own risk metrics.
When deciding between MFF and FTMO, use the following practical checklist to align your choice with your trading goals. These criteria are drawn from common industry practices and regulatory guidance from bodies like the NFA and FINRA, which emphasize the importance of understanding your counterparty and risk parameters.
The prop-trading space is rife with myths. Clearing these up is vital for making a sound decision.
Prop trading, while offering access to substantial capital, introduces unique risks. The CFTC and NFA consistently warn that leverage and market volatility can lead to rapid losses, even in evaluation environments. The following controls are essential.
Both MFF and FTMO have a 5% daily loss limit. Exceeding this limit—even for a minute—can fail your challenge. Use daily loss limit alerts on your trading platform to stay within bounds.
With leverage often set at 1:30 or higher (depending on the partner broker), a single bad trade can wipe out a large portion of your allowed drawdown. Risk no more than 1% of your total account per trade.
If you fail the challenge, you can usually purchase a retry at a discount. However, treat this as a contingency, not a safety net. Repeated failures are costly.
Do not over-optimize your strategy to pass the specific challenge rules (curve fitting). The funded account is live, and market dynamics change. Strategies should be robust.
Prop trading is speculative. You are not trading with your own capital, but the evaluation fee is at risk. There is no guarantee of earning a payout or passing the challenge. The CFTC has issued investor alerts cautioning that retail forex trading is volatile and that firms offering trading capital should be vetted thoroughly. The NFA BASIC system can help you check the regulatory standing of the executing broker. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Always verify current rules, fees, spreads, rates, broker availability, and platform terms with the relevant authority or provider before committing funds.